I did some digging into the upcoming Open XML formats and found a great article by Ted Pattison explaining the changes MS have made. Essentially the new docx format is a zip file containing a bunch of other files mostly XML files that make up a word document ms refer to this as the 'Package'. Ted has written a great article that explains how it all hangs together in some detail.

So why did MS go to all this trouble? Well folks like me want to be able to programatically work with Word documents on the serverside so we can automate certain processes. The old binary formats supported by previous versions were unfriendly so we tended to use the word object model or VBA to do this. These were not very performant and less than 100% reliable. So according to Ted the new formats will allow manipulation of word files without installation of Word via some new .Net classes. To start with this will not be straightforward, first you will have to familiarise yourself with how a docx package is structured, but I imagine some coding gurus have begun work on this already and by the time Office 2007 is released you will be able to purchase a 3rd party component that will make indenting paragraphs a snip.

We have a need to manipulate bookmarks so we can inject data into documents prior to converting them to PDF's. I am on the lookout for worthy open source projects that are attempting to undertake this task, I would gladly make a contribution to their efforts in order to reap the rewards :o)

Another great article that goes into more detail

A project with example code on how to create a simple docx from scratch.

http://boulter.com/blog/2004/08/19/performant-is-not-a-word/

I have been using Google Spreadsheets to see how useful a tool it really is. I uploaded a small Excel sheet that I built for the purpose of testing out the GS application.

Unlike Excel in GS you have to insert extra rows and columns as and when you need them. You can perform multiple inserts by highlighting multiple rows, then right-clicking and selecting insert 5 below or above. I attempted to select 30 and insert 30 below then 60, 120, 240. When I tried to insert 240 something broke because the 240 rows did not get inserted and there was permanent Updating... message. Maybe this is just a glitch or maybe you cannot work with this many rows. I noticed that Internet Explorer's memory usage rose to ~80mb typically this is about ~20mb.

My conclusions are that currently they are only suitable for light duties, where online access and or collaberation is needed. This may with time and effort on googles part change.

I just wasted a day figuring this out. Basically we have an ASP.net application written in VB dotnet where all the pages inherit from a base page. The base page in turn inherits from System.Web.UI.Page. We use the base page along with some user controls to 'theme' our application.

The application is quite mature so I was a little suprised when I checked it out of source control and it blew up in my face when I attempted to edit one of the web forms in the forms designer. A large message box would pop up complaining that ....

To finish the solution was to remove the Base Page file from the project and copy the contents to new file then add it back to the project then all was well again.

Apparently VS2003 is not very smart when it comes to Design Time / Run Time issues good things are already being said about VS2005 in this reagard but time will tell.

We recently visited the Cornish Seal Sanctuary, I have posted a video on google video that I edited with Microsoft Movie Maker. This is the video editing for dummies utility offered free by microsoft.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4872552981579413160&hl=en

We were just notified by one of our client's that my company's website www.redlinesoftware.co.uk was not available. When we try to browse to it there is no response. I can't get www.brinkster.com to load either so I'm not sure what is going on.

I'm not the only one having this problem, I imagine there are some very worried people at Brinkster today. We have used them for nearly two years and this is the first problem we have had.

UPDATE: Looks like they are back online which makes the outage five hours max not too bad considering what brinkster charge.

I discovered this site via http://www.feedmap.net/ , it is interesting to see how nearby other bloggers are simply as a measure of how commonplace blogging is becoming. My blog is not nearly as social as bluemeanie. I am very tech focused so tend only to read other techie blogs (check my blogroll) reading bluemeanie it is clear different people have differen reasons for keeping a blog.

The bluemeanie site contains a nice content focused on friends and family and travelling with lots of picures.

This entry contains a photo of our local park, 'Master Park'. http://bluemeanie.org/weblog/comments/master-park/

If any of the bluemeanie bloggers surf in here, then I would just like to say 'Hello to a fellow Oxted blogger'.

Recently a friend asked me about which VOIP solution is best this is what I told him.

"Skype is the easier to setup it handles NAT traversal very well, the handsets we use for Skype (<£30) are USB so need to be plugged into a PC to work. I believe you can now get Skype Adaptors for normal analog phones and Skype phones that don't need a PC to work, I don't have any experience of these and they will be more expensive ~£100.

VOIPtalk offer SIP/IAX2 services, the handsets that support these protocols start at £50 but you should spend at least £80 to get a half decent one. You will need a CAT5 socket to connect them to your LAN although you could use WiFi. If you want to have several phones in your house with each room acting as an extension then you should think about installing Linux/Asterisk onto an old PC and run your own mini PBX. This will take a lot more setting up and the learning curve is a lot steeper. You pay a one-off fee of £10 for an inbound 0845 number and buy credit in £5-£50 chunks, you can set your account to auto top-up to save you the hassle of topping up via their website. If you go the VOIPTALK route make sure your Broadband Router has QoS functionality otherwise you won't be able to hear people when you are downloading large files. It will also need port forwarding and I would recommend using IAX2 over SIP as it only requires one port to be forwarded.
Some (most) routers will not allow SIP to traverse NAT.

In terms of call quality / reliability Skype has the edge in Internet=>Internet calls (which are also free) and Voiptalk has the edge in Internet=>Landline/Mobile calls.

Re call charges, I don't think there is a lot in it but you can checkout their respective websites.

I'm sure your aware that more and more ISP's are starting to offer VOIP services so you might be able to get what your looking for that way."